Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 176 • VG SZ III 2019 176 KI-generiert

Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 176
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A higher court reviewed an appeal against a lower authority's decision to establish a protective guardianship for an adult, concerning matters of adult protective services. The appellant contested the establishment of this guardianship, leading to the judicial review of the necessity and appropriateness of the measure ordered by the initial authority. The court's reasoning, leading to its verdict, would have involved an assessment of the adult's capacity, the need for legal representation or assistance in their affairs, and whether the established measure was in the person's best interest and met the statutory requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment: The appellant contested the establishment of this guardianship, leading to the judicial review of the necessity and appropriateness of the measure ordered by the initial authority. The court's reasoning, leading to its verdict, would have involved an assessment of the adult's capacity, the need for legal representation or assistance in their affairs, and whether the established measure was in the person's best interest and met the statutory requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vertretung im Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutz Normenkontrolle Erwachsenenschutzverfahren Rechtsfähigkeit gesetzliche Voraussetzung Rechtshilfebehörde
KI-generiert
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2019 86
Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment
III 2022 86
Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult
III 2018 204
Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 176 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Vertretungsbeistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: