Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 16 • VG SZ III 2019 16 KI-generiert

Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 16
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves a challenge to a decision by a child and adult protection authority, with the appellant contesting the ruling made by that authority, which was also a party to the appeal, alongside an interested third party. The court reached its verdict on March 25, 2019, following deliberations by a panel including a Vice President, two Judges, and a Court Clerk, without providing the specific details of the challenged decision or the reasoning for the final judgment in the provided excerpt.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal: The court reached its verdict on March 25, 2019, following deliberations by a panel including a Vice President, two Judges, and a Court Clerk, without providing the specific details of the challenged decision or the reasoning for the final judgment in the provided excerpt.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Kindesschutzverfahren Rechtsgutachten Beschwerdelegitimation Rechte des Kindes Besuchsrecht
KI-generiert
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld
III 2018 178
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 16 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n