Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 152 • VG SZ III 2019 152 KI-generiert

Traffic Fine Enforcement Upheld Against Non-Challenged Penalty Order

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 152
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged a final demand for payment issued by the traffic authority regarding an administrative fine related to traffic law, where the petitioner had previously failed to comply with a penalty order. The court upheld the traffic authority's decision, reasoning that the initial penalty order became legally binding upon the petitioner's failure to contest it within the prescribed period, thereby authorizing the subsequent execution proceedings, including the final demand for payment, as no legal grounds for overturning the original administrative decision were established.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Traffic Fine Enforcement Upheld Against Non-Challenged Penalty Order: The court upheld the traffic authority's decision, reasoning that the initial penalty order became legally binding upon the petitioner's failure to contest it within the prescribed period, thereby authorizing the subsequent execution proceedings, including the final demand for payment, as no legal grounds for overturning the original administrative decision were established.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ordnungsbusse Vollstreckungsentscheid Zahlungsauftrag bedingte Geldstrafe Durchsetzungshaft Verwaltungsbehörde Strassenverkehrsrecht (Betreibungsandrohung) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
KI-generiert
STK 2022 10
Traffic Violation Speeding Conviction Upheld
STK 2020 52
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
III 2019 149
Traffic Authority Sanction Upheld in License Suspension Case
III 2020 185
Appeal Against Municipal Fine Enforcement Decision
BEK 2024 50
Appellant's Failure to Meet Formal Appeal Requirements Upheld in Speeding Fine Administrative Costs Dispute

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 152 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Betreibungsandrohung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: