Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA litigant challenged a municipal council's refusal to issue a building permit for the construction of a multi-family house, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal development authority and the cantonal government, arguing that the proposed development did not violate the spatial planning regulations regarding density and building height. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 122 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Galgenen, Büelstrasse 15, 8854 Siebnen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n
\n\n
\n