Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2019 122 • VG SZ III 2019 122 KI-generiert

Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 122
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A litigant challenged a municipal council's refusal to issue a building permit for the construction of a multi-family house, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal development authority and the cantonal government, arguing that the proposed development did not violate the spatial planning regulations regarding density and building height. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Permit Denial Upheld Over Density and Height Violations: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed building exceeded the permissible building volume and height limits set by the applicable development plan, specifically finding that the appellant's interpretation of the density regulations, which relied on a specific floor area ratio calculation that included non-habitable spaces, was incorrect under the binding provisions governing the area.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Überschreitung der Gebäudehöhe kommunale Baubewilligung Bauordnung Zonenbeschränkungen Plangenehmigung Immobilienbesitz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to order the appellant to pay the costs of the federal administrative proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 122 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Galgenen, Büelstrasse 15, 8854 Siebnen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n