Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2019 119 • VG SZ III 2019 119 KI-generiert

Municipal Resolution Zoning Setback Appeal

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 119
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal against a decision upholding a municipal resolution that denied an application for the construction of an accessory building, where the appellant challenged the decision based on a lack of proper procedural consideration of their submissions and an incorrect application of zoning setback regulations regarding neighboring properties. The court reasoned that the initial decision-making body had indeed considered the relevant planning documents and public feedback, thus satisfying procedural requirements, and further determined that the construction in question did not infringe upon the required setbacks of adjacent properties as stipulated by the applicable regulations, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 103 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Municipal Resolution Zoning Setback Appeal: The court reasoned that the initial decision-making body had indeed considered the relevant planning documents and public feedback, thus satisfying procedural requirements, and further determined that the construction in question did not infringe upon the required setbacks of adjacent properties as stipulated by the applicable regulations, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bau- und Zonenordnung Grenzabstandsvorschriften Immobilienbesitz Bauordnung Prozessvoraussetzung kommunale Baubewilligung Planungs- und Baurecht (Baustopp) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 103 Abs. 1 BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was filed too late.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellants are ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2022 49
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial Based on Setback Violation
III 2022 133
Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Setback Enforcement
III 2019 71
Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance
III 2019 70
Municipal Council v. Planning Law Setback Challenge
III 2019 84
Building Permit Setback Dispute

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 103 Abs. 1 BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it was filed too late.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellants are ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 119 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. C.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeindepräsident bzw. Gemeinderat Lachen, \n Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n3. E.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.A. F.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n