Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2019 103 • VG SZ III 2019 103 KI-generiert

Challenge to Building Permit Decision Based on Flawed Administrative Opinion

Geschäftsnummer III 2019 103
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a planning decision by the municipal council, upheld by the cantonal planning authority and the cantonal government, concerning a building permit application, alleging that the cantonal spatial development office's opinion, which served as a basis for the initial decision, was procedurally flawed because it was issued without proper consultation with the municipality, and the court reasoned that the alleged procedural error in the initial administrative opinion did not render the subsequent planning decisions fundamentally unlawful, as the core issue involved the correct interpretation and application of spatial planning law, which the reviewing authorities addressed appropriately.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Challenge to Building Permit Decision Based on Flawed Administrative Opinion: A party challenged a planning decision by the municipal council, upheld by the cantonal planning authority and the cantonal government, concerning a building permit application, alleging that the cantonal spatial development office's opinion, which served as a basis for the initial decision, was procedurally flawed because it was issued without proper consultation with the municipality, and the court reasoned that the alleged procedural error in the initial administrative opinion did not render the subsequent planning decisions fundamentally unlawful, as the core issue involved the correct interpretation and application of spatial planning law, which the reviewing authorities addressed appropriately.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
kommunale Baubewilligung Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Verfahrensüberprüfung Plangenehmigung Nutzungsplanrevision
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 103 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lauerz, Husmatt 1, 6424 Lauerz, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n