Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 96 • VG SZ III 2018 96 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an appeal against a building permit issued by the local council for a project, with the administrative body rejecting the complaints lodged by the appellants. The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient basis because the challenged construction permit decision did not violate any applicable spatial planning regulations, specifically finding no basis to substantiate the appellants' claims regarding the project's alleged inconsistency with the local development plan or its impact on neighborhood interests, thereby upholding the lower administrative decisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld: The court reasoned that the appeal lacked a sufficient basis because the challenged construction permit decision did not violate any applicable spatial planning regulations, specifically finding no basis to substantiate the appellants' claims regarding the project's alleged inconsistency with the local development plan or its impact on neighborhood interests, thereby upholding the lower administrative decisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Baubewilligung Plangenehmigung Verwaltungsbeschwerde öffentlich-rechtliches Bauverbot Grundeigentum Baupolizei Planungs- und Baurecht (nachträgliche Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the complaint did not meet the requirement of substantiation regarding the alleged violation of Article 182 of the Cantonal Building Regulations.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.
KI-generiert
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2024 139
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 93 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the complaint did not meet the requirement of substantiation regarding the alleged violation of Article 182 of the Cantonal Building Regulations.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n Ziff. 1 vertreten durch Ziff. 2; Ziff. 2 und 3 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. E.________ AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n |\n

\n\n

\n