Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 93 • VG SZ III 2018 93 KI-generiert

Zoning Amendment Upholding Local Development Plan

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 93
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A group of ten parties appealed a decision concerning an amendment to a local zoning plan that designated certain undeveloped land as building land, which was approved by the local council and subsequently by the cantonal authorities. The court reasoned that the zoning amendment, while potentially infringing on property rights, served a legitimate public interest in ensuring adequate infrastructure and housing supply within the municipality, and the decision to reclassify the land was based on a reasonable planning assessment that did not demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion or an unconstitutional application of land-use law, thus upholding the challenged zoning change.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Zoning Amendment Upholding Local Development Plan: The court reasoned that the zoning amendment, while potentially infringing on property rights, served a legitimate public interest in ensuring adequate infrastructure and housing supply within the municipality, and the decision to reclassify the land was based on a reasonable planning assessment that did not demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion or an unconstitutional application of land-use law, thus upholding the challenged zoning change.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Nutzungsplan Planungsermessen Bodenrecht Bauträger Entwicklungsrecht Verwendungsrecht Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This article governs the imposition of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2018 87
Zoning Amendment Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2022 111
Zoning Plan Modification Upheld Despite Appeal
III 2019 26
Zoning Amendment Challenge Upheld Against Objectors
III 2018 227
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This article governs the imposition of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 93 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________ \n9. I.________, \n10. J.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. K.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n