Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 9 • VG SZ III 2018 9 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 9
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns an appeal challenging a decision by local and cantonal authorities regarding the approval of development plans. The appellant contested the underlying planning decisions, arguing they were flawed or unlawfully enacted. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged planning decisions violated their rights, specifically noting that the appellant did not substantiate claims of procedural defects or substantive illegality in the official planning process that directly prejudiced their legal standing to challenge the outcome.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision: The appellant contested the underlying planning decisions, arguing they were flawed or unlawfully enacted. The court found that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged planning decisions violated their rights, specifically noting that the appellant did not substantiate claims of procedural defects or substantive illegality in the official planning process that directly prejudiced their legal standing to challenge the outcome.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Plangenehmigung Beschwerdelegitimation Verfahrensmangel Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Entwicklungsrecht kommunale Gebietskörperschaft Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung, Balkonanbau) | Planungs- und Baurecht
KI-generiert
III 2022 127
Planning Authority Decision Appeal
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision
III 2017 234
Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n