Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2018 55 • VG SZ III 2018 55 KI-generiert

Property Owner Appeal Regarding Land Cooperative Usage Fee Assessment

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 55
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A property owner appealed a decision concerning the assessment of usage fees owed to a land cooperative for the use of common property, arguing that the established fee structure, based on the proportion of the main property's area to the total cooperative area, unfairly burdened their smaller lot compared to larger lots, especially since the smaller lot had limited actual use of the common areas. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that while the fee structure might appear disproportionate in individual cases, it was based on a principle of objective proportionality derived from the cooperative's foundation and bylaws, and deviating from this established, neutral allocation method would require a demonstrably untenable or inequitable result, which was not established by the appellant.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Property Owner Appeal Regarding Land Cooperative Usage Fee Assessment: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that while the fee structure might appear disproportionate in individual cases, it was based on a principle of objective proportionality derived from the cooperative's foundation and bylaws, and deviating from this established, neutral allocation method would require a demonstrably untenable or inequitable result, which was not established by the appellant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
gemeinschaftlicher Teil Verhältnismässigkeit haushälterische Bodennutzung Wohnbaugenossenschaft Wasserrechtszins Katasterschätzung Korporationsrecht (Kostenverteilplan Flurgenossenschaft) | Korporationsrecht
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. September 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Flurgenossenschaft Chräbelstrasse, \n z.Hd. B.________, |\n \n\n

\n