Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2018 46 • VG SZ III 2018 46 KI-generiert

Asset Management for Protected Person Investment Strategy Review

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 46
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a dispute over asset management for a protected person, specifically regarding investment strategies under the relevant social security regulations, where the petitioners sought a review of a prior decision concerning the authorized investment approach for these assets. The court reasoned that given the protected person's limited life expectancy and the need to preserve capital while generating some income, the previous authority's decision to mandate a lower-risk investment strategy, even if it resulted in slightly lower potential returns than other proposed options, was appropriate as it prioritized the principal's capital preservation over maximizing profit under the circumstances.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Asset Management for Protected Person Investment Strategy Review: The court reasoned that given the protected person's limited life expectancy and the need to preserve capital while generating some income, the previous authority's decision to mandate a lower-risk investment strategy, even if it resulted in slightly lower potential returns than other proposed options, was appropriate as it prioritized the principal's capital preservation over maximizing profit under the circumstances.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vermögensverwaltung Rückkehrrisiko Kapitaleinkünfte Bedrohung der inneren Sicherheit soziale Sicherheit Haftung aus Anlageberatung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 46 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch A.________, \n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, Domizil: Industriestrasse 7, 6440 Brunnen, C.________, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n |\n \n|\n |\n |\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Vermögensanlagen nach VBVV; Anlagestrategie) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: