Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 44 • VG SZ III 2018 44 KI-generiert

Provisional Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Initial Culpability Findings

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 44
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual challenged a provisional withdrawal of their driving license imposed by the traffic authority following an administrative proceeding concerning a road traffic offense. The court reasoned that the authority was justified in imposing the provisional measure because the individual's culpability was deemed sufficient based on the initial findings, thereby creating a significant likelihood of a final measure affecting their fitness to drive, which warranted immediate protective action.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Provisional Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Initial Culpability Findings: The court reasoned that the authority was justified in imposing the provisional measure because the individual's culpability was deemed sufficient based on the initial findings, thereby creating a significant likelihood of a final measure affecting their fitness to drive, which warranted immediate protective action.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Führerausweisentzug Fahreignung "Vorläufige Geltung" Einziehung des Motorfahrzeugs schuldhaftes Verhalten Ausstandsverfahren Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
KI-generiert
III 2018 142
Motorist License Withdrawal Upheld Over Fitness Concerns
III 2019 177
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving
III 2021 90
Appeal Against Provisional Driving License Withdrawal
III 2021 143
Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Upheld Based on Prior Offenses and Reckless Racing Conviction
III 2018 31
Provisional License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Drug Possession and Admission of Use

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 44 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: