Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 218 • VG SZ III 2018 218 KI-generiert

Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 218
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought judicial review of a decision by the traffic authority to temporarily suspend their driving license as a precautionary measure following an incident. The court reasoned that the authority was entitled to impose such a measure based on evidence suggesting a significant danger posed by the driver, as the primary purpose of a precautionary license withdrawal is to immediately prevent further risk to traffic safety, and this measure can be justified even before a final assessment of the underlying violation is complete.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension: The court reasoned that the authority was entitled to impose such a measure based on evidence suggesting a significant danger posed by the driver, as the primary purpose of a precautionary license withdrawal is to immediately prevent further risk to traffic safety, and this measure can be justified even before a final assessment of the underlying violation is complete.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Führerausweisentzug Normenkontrolle Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln Fahren in fahrunfähigem Zustand Zwangslizenz Risikobewertung Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
KI-generiert
III 2019 202
Traffic Authority v. Driver (Provisional License Seizure)
III 2018 75
Road Traffic Authority v. Driver (License Withdrawal Appeal)
III 2017 190
Judicial Review of Driving License Revocation
III 2020 135
Suspension of Driving License Due to Suspected Unreliability Upheld
III 2021 91
Traffic License Withdrawal Appeal Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 218 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: