Appeal of Protective Measure Decision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA party appealed a decision by the child and adult protection authority regarding a protective measure, where the core dispute likely involved the appropriateness or continuation of that measure concerning the appellant. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual basis and legal justification presented by the authority for imposing the protective measure, ultimately affirming or overturning the decision based on whether the authority acted within its statutory mandate and demonstrated a reasonable necessity for the intervention affecting the appellant's rights.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Protective Measure Decision: The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual basis and legal justification presented by the authority for imposing the protective measure, ultimately affirming or overturning the decision based on whether the authority acted within its statutory mandate and demonstrated a reasonable necessity for the intervention affecting the appellant's rights.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe Appellant must bear the court costs.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 212 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, |\n
\n\n
\n