Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 207 • VG SZ III 2018 207 KI-generiert

Immigration Residence Permit Denial for Insufficient Family Ties

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 207
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party sought judicial review against decisions from the cantonal government and the Office of Migration concerning their immigration status, challenging the denial of an application for a residence permit based on family reunification grounds. The court reasoned that the initial application failed to demonstrate the necessary sustained cohabitation and genuine marital relationship required by the relevant immigration laws, as the evidence only established a marriage of short duration and insufficient integration factors, thus affirming the prior rejections of the residence permit request.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Immigration Residence Permit Denial for Insufficient Family Ties: The court reasoned that the initial application failed to demonstrate the necessary sustained cohabitation and genuine marital relationship required by the relevant immigration laws, as the evidence only established a marriage of short duration and insufficient integration factors, thus affirming the prior rejections of the residence permit request.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Familienbewilligung Familienstand Normenkontrolle Nichtigerklärung der erleichterten Einbürgerung verzögerter Familiennachzug Einwanderungspolitik

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This article was cited for the allocation of court costs to the losing party.
KI-generiert
III 2019 27
Appeal Regarding Denial of Family Reunification Residence Permits
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2017 231
Appeal Against Denial of Residence Permits Based on Insufficient Integration and Means
III 2020 78
Judicial Review of Residence Permit Extension Denial Based on Integration Factors
III 2020 194
Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Residence Permit Based on Insufficient Integration

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This article was cited for the allocation of court costs to the losing party.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 207 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, \n Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n