Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 206 • VG SZ III 2018 206 KI-generiert

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 206
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

Several property owners challenged a municipal decision to establish a public right-of-way easement across their land to connect two public paths, arguing that the easement imposed an excessive burden and that the municipality failed to properly consider alternative routes or adequately compensate them for the expropriation. The court reasoned that the municipality was justified in establishing the easement because the public interest in creating a continuous, functional path network outweighed the private property owners' interest, and while the burden was present, it was not disproportionate to the public benefit achieved, thus affirming the legality of the established easement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement: The court reasoned that the municipality was justified in establishing the easement because the public interest in creating a continuous, functional path network outweighed the private property owners' interest, and while the burden was present, it was not disproportionate to the public benefit achieved, thus affirming the legality of the established easement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Dienstbarkeit Gemeindeland Eigentumsrecht Enteignung Enteignungsberechtigung Impropriation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was applied to determine the costs of the federal proceedings.
KI-generiert
ZK1 2018 29
Municipality v. Easement Scope for Construction Use
III 2018 136
Property Owner v. Municipality (Infrastructure Requirement for Building Permit)
III 2023 196
Property Owners' Access Rights Over Private Road Upheld
III 2019 6
Expropriation for Utility Easement Connection
III 2023 47
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Service Road Designation

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was applied to determine the costs of the federal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 206 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. F.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n