Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 205 • VG SZ III 2018 205 KI-generiert

Agricultural Land Conversion Appeal Decision Upheld

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 205
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged an administrative decision concerning agricultural land use, specifically appealing a ruling by the agricultural office regarding the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court reasoned that the administrative decision was sound because the statutory requirements for granting the conversion permission were not met, emphasizing that the primary purpose of the land use regulations is to preserve agricultural land, and the appellant failed to demonstrate the necessary exceptional circumstances or public interest to justify the deviation from this principle.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Agricultural Land Conversion Appeal Decision Upheld: The court reasoned that the administrative decision was sound because the statutory requirements for granting the conversion permission were not met, emphasizing that the primary purpose of the land use regulations is to preserve agricultural land, and the appellant failed to demonstrate the necessary exceptional circumstances or public interest to justify the deviation from this principle.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
landwirtschaftliches Grundstück Bodenrecht Erstreckung des Pachtverhältnisses gesetzliche Voraussetzung Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft Gemeinatzung
KI-generiert
III 2016 11
Agricultural Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Untimely Land Conversion
III 2017 60
Appeal Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Building to Commercial Center
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2016 134
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 205 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Mai 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________ |\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n|\n |\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n