Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 204 • VG SZ III 2018 204 KI-generiert

Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 204
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a decision by the local Child and Adult Protection Authority to establish a protective trusteeship (Beistandschaft) for them, concerning their personal and financial affairs. The court determined that the appellate court correctly confirmed the necessity of the trusteeship because the appellant, despite being capable of making decisions in principle, consistently failed to take necessary measures to safeguard their personal welfare and financial interests, necessitating the intervention based on legal provisions regarding the protection of vulnerable adults.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment: The court determined that the appellate court correctly confirmed the necessity of the trusteeship because the appellant, despite being capable of making decisions in principle, consistently failed to take necessary measures to safeguard their personal welfare and financial interests, necessitating the intervention based on legal provisions regarding the protection of vulnerable adults.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kindesschutzmassnahmen Erwachsenenschutz Erforderlichkeit Haftung des Beistands Finanzvorschriften Treuhandsystem

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was used to regulate the court costs following the dismissal of the appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2022 51
Establishment of Protective Guardianship for Financially Vulnerable Individual
III 2019 86
Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2018 212
Appeal of Protective Measure Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was used to regulate the court costs following the dismissal of the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 204 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Beistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: