Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe case concerns an appeal challenging the partial revision of a zoning plan by a municipal council. The appellants contested the decision regarding the land use designation, which had immediate practical consequences for their property rights. The court reasoned that the initial administrative decision did not violate applicable law, particularly concerning the requirement for a justifiable public interest in the planning changes and adherence to procedural regulations regarding the scope of the revision, thus upholding the lower administrative decision.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAppeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision: The appellants contested the decision regarding the land use designation, which had immediate practical consequences for their property rights. The court reasoned that the initial administrative decision did not violate applicable law, particularly concerning the requirement for a justifiable public interest in the planning changes and adherence to procedural regulations regarding the scope of the revision, thus upholding the lower administrative decision.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 181 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. Juni 2021 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, vertreten durch C.________, 3. C.________, Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Teilrevision Nutzungsplanung Küssnacht) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: