Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 178 • VG SZ III 2018 178 KI-generiert

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 178
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding a measure affecting their legal status, which involved the authority intervening in personal matters. The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the authority's decision was contrary to law or that the established facts were incorrectly assessed, thus upholding the authority's application of the relevant protective measures.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision: The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the authority's decision was contrary to law or that the established facts were incorrectly assessed, thus upholding the authority's application of the relevant protective measures.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Kindesschutzmassnahmen Untätigkeitsklage Entziehung der elterlichen Gewalt Beschwerdelegitimation Rechtsstellung
KI-generiert
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2022 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Protective Measures Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2019 16
Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 178 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Januar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, \n B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n