Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 17 • VG SZ III 2018 17 KI-generiert

Supervised Leave Denial Annulled for Insufficient Factual Basis

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 17
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An appellant sought permission for supervised leave from a penal institution, which the responsible authority denied. The appellant challenged this denial, arguing that the authority failed to properly consider the legal requirements for granting supervised release, particularly concerning the assessment of the risk posed by the appellant and the suitability of the proposed supervision plan. The court reasoned that the authority's decision lacked a sufficient factual basis and failed to adequately weigh the statutory criteria, particularly the public interest in safety against the rehabilitative goals of partial release, thus necessitating the annulment of the decision and remittance for a new assessment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Supervised Leave Denial Annulled for Insufficient Factual Basis: The appellant challenged this denial, arguing that the authority failed to properly consider the legal requirements for granting supervised release, particularly concerning the assessment of the risk posed by the appellant and the suitability of the proposed supervision plan. The court reasoned that the authority's decision lacked a sufficient factual basis and failed to adequately weigh the statutory criteria, particularly the public interest in safety against the rehabilitative goals of partial release, thus necessitating the annulment of the decision and remittance for a new assessment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Sachverhaltsgrundlage gesetzliche Voraussetzung Beurteilungskriterien Anfechtung der Kündigung unbezahlter Urlaub Teilentscheid Strafvollzug (Begehren um begleiteten Ausgang) | Strafvollzug
KI-generiert
BEK 2023 67
Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility
BEK 2019 60
Appeal Against Detention Denied for Lack of Specific Legal Grounds
III 2022 35
Appeal Regarding Continuation of Welfare Supervision
III 2020 102
Judicial Review of Denial of Early Prison Release Based on Statutory Compliance
II 2019 83
Appeal Regarding Lawful Termination of Employment Due to Management Prerogatives and Employee Non-Cooperation

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 17 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Sandra Sutter-Jeker, Totentanz 4, Postfach 1059, 4001 Basel, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Justizvollzug, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 73, 8836 Bennau, Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strafvollzug (Begehren um begleiteten Ausgang) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: