Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 168 • VG SZ III 2018 168 KI-generiert

Petitioner v. Local Council on Initiative Inadmissibility

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 168
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A petitioner challenged a local council's decision that deemed their municipal initiative proposal inadmissible on formal grounds, specifically concerning a lack of proper coordination with related prior votes. The court reasoned that the challenged decision was founded on a factual error regarding the prerequisite for the initiative's formal submission, namely the status of a prior related resolution, which had not yet become legally effective at the time of the council's review, thus rendering the council's rejection premature and legally unsubstantiated.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Petitioner v. Local Council on Initiative Inadmissibility: The court reasoned that the challenged decision was founded on a factual error regarding the prerequisite for the initiative's formal submission, namely the status of a prior related resolution, which had not yet become legally effective at the time of the council's review, thus rendering the council's rejection premature and legally unsubstantiated.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Petitionsrecht Verfassungsinitiative Behördenreferendum Revisionsgrund Gemeindeautonomie Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Politische Rechte (Zulässigkeit eines Initiativbegehrens) | Politische Rechte
KI-generiert
III 2017 161
Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility
III 2020 203
Challenge to Planning Decision Admissibility
III 2022 66
Municipal Council Building Regulation Enforcement Appeal Inadmissibility
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge
III 2018 107
Citizens' Initiative Challenging School Closure Deemed Inadmissible

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 168 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Lachen, 8853 Lachen, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Politische Rechte (Zulässigkeit eines Initiativbegehrens) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: