Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 163 • VG SZ III 2018 163 KI-generiert

Challenge to Denial of Building Permit in Protected Zone

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 163
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a decision regarding a building permit application that was previously denied by the lower administrative bodies. The appellant sought to overturn the rejection of their construction plans, which concerned a property within a protected zone. The court reasoned that the original application failed to demonstrate sufficient public interest justification or adherence to the specific, strict development constraints imposed by the relevant zoning and environmental regulations for the designated area, thus affirming the lower authorities' denial as legally sound.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Challenge to Denial of Building Permit in Protected Zone: The appellant sought to overturn the rejection of their construction plans, which concerned a property within a protected zone. The court reasoned that the original application failed to demonstrate sufficient public interest justification or adherence to the specific, strict development constraints imposed by the relevant zoning and environmental regulations for the designated area, thus affirming the lower authorities' denial as legally sound.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bauzone Baubewilligung Schutzzone Bau- und Zonenordnung Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen rechtlich geschütztes Interesse
KI-generiert
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2018 120
Zoning Compliance and Building Permit Denial
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 163 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n