Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 157 • VG SZ III 2018 157 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Child Protection Measures and Custodian Appointment

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 157
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerned an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding the assumption of child protection measures and the appointment of a custodian. The appellant challenged the lower court's ruling on these protective measures for the child. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the established facts justified the continuation or imposition of the specific child protection measures and the appointment of the custodian, thereby confirming the prior determination regarding the child's welfare needs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Child Protection Measures and Custodian Appointment: The appellant challenged the lower court's ruling on these protective measures for the child. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the established facts justified the continuation or imposition of the specific child protection measures and the appointment of the custodian, thereby confirming the prior determination regarding the child's welfare needs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kindesschutzmassnahmen Sorgerechtsverfahren Beistandsbestellung Kindesunterbringung Freiheitsstrafe Ausübung des Besuchsrechts
KI-generiert
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2018 221
Appeal of Child Protection Measure Adjustment
III 2019 141
Modification of Child Protection Measures Appeal
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2017 210
Child Protection Placement Appeal Remanded for Clarification

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 157 III 2018 158 III 2018 159 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________,und J. \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Übernahme von Kindesschutzmassnahmen/ Beistandschaft nach