Mother's Appeal of Fee Award in Child and Adult Protection Case Dismissed for Untimely Reassessment Request
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA mother, acting for herself and her minor child, appealed a decision regarding a fee award concerning child and adult protection law proceedings initiated by the local child and adult protection authority. The court ruled that the mother's claim for compensation was inadmissible because the application to set the fee amount, which was submitted after the underlying decision had already become legally binding, was not an appeal against the decision itself, but rather a request for reassessment that was not permitted under the relevant procedural rules for challenging the fee determination after the finality of the primary ruling.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 68 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Mother's Appeal of Fee Award in Child and Adult Protection Case Dismissed for Untimely Reassessment Request: The court ruled that the mother's claim for compensation was inadmissible because the application to set the fee amount, which was submitted after the underlying decision had already become legally binding, was not an appeal against the decision itself, but rather a request for reassessment that was not permitted under the relevant procedural rules for challenging the fee determination after the finality of the primary ruling.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertThe court rejected the appeal regarding the legal aid request.
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Volltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 153 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. November 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n vertreten durch ihre Mutter B.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerinnen, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, C.________, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Mandatsentschädigung) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: