Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 150 • VG SZ III 2018 150 KI-generiert

Municipal Council Appeal Against Cantonal Development Plan Amendment Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 150
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A municipal council challenged a prior decision concerning a development plan amendment, which had been approved by higher cantonal authorities and involved two corporate entities, arguing against the legality of the amendment's scope or procedure. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the municipal council lacked the requisite standing to appeal against a decision made by the higher cantonal bodies concerning a matter in which the municipality itself was an interested party or decision-maker, and that the challenged administrative acts were not shown to violate the appellant's rights or applicable planning law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Municipal Council Appeal Against Cantonal Development Plan Amendment Dismissed for Lack of Standing: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the municipal council lacked the requisite standing to appeal against a decision made by the higher cantonal bodies concerning a matter in which the municipality itself was an interested party or decision-maker, and that the challenged administrative acts were not shown to violate the appellant's rights or applicable planning law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Legitimation der Gemeinde Beschwerdelegitimation Planungsverfahren Entwicklungsrecht Behördenreferendum Genehmigung der Verordnung
KI-generiert
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2017 234
Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed
III 2020 34
Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed
III 2017 100
Appeal Dismissed Against Municipal Council Decision
III 2023 153
Appeal Against Municipal Planning Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 150 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Februar 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, , \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. A.________ AG, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, \n5. C.________ AG, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerinnen, |\n

\n\n

\n