Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 138 • VG SZ III 2018 138 KI-generiert

Child Welfare Supervision Upheld Against Parental Challenge

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 138
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party challenged a decision that placed their minor child, who had exhibited concerning behavior including drug use, under the supervision of the relevant authorities, with the challenging party disputing the need for supervision and custody measures. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the authorities acted within their legal authority to protect the child's well-being given the established facts of drug use and concerning behavior, and that the imposed measures were proportionate to the risks identified.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Child Welfare Supervision Upheld Against Parental Challenge: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the authorities acted within their legal authority to protect the child's well-being given the established facts of drug use and concerning behavior, and that the imposed measures were proportionate to the risks identified.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
minderjähriges Kind begleitetes Besuchsrecht elterliche Gewalt Kindesschutzverfahren begründeter Entscheid verwaltungsmäßige Zuordnung Sozialhilfe (Krankenversicherung/Arztrechnungen) | Sozialhilfe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
III 2021 215
Supervision and Education Measures Upheld Against Parental Challenge
III 2020 42
Supervised Visitation Upheld Despite Child's Objection
III 2017 55
Parental Custody Restriction for Child Welfare
III 2021 213
Parental Rights Challenge to Minor's Institutional Placement Upheld
III 2021 154
Mother's Custody Suspension Upheld in Child Welfare Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 138 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Fürsorgebehörde Freienbach, Churerstrasse 15, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon SZ, \n Vorinstanz I, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz II, \n |\n

\n\n

\n