Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2018 101 • VG SZ III 2018 101 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Geschäftsnummer III 2018 101
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority concerning a guardianship matter. The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision: The appellant challenged the authority's ruling, which presumably related to the care or protection of an individual. The court reached its verdict by reviewing the factual findings and legal basis of the authority's decision, ultimately deciding whether the challenged measure was in the best interest of the protected person and complied with relevant statutes governing guardianship and protection.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vormundschaftsbehörde Überprüfung der Beistandschaft Kindeswohlgefährdung Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Sachverhaltsgrundlage Besuchsrecht
KI-generiert
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2018 101 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, \n B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) F.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n