Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2017 234 • VG SZ III 2017 234 KI-generiert

Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 234
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A party appealed a decision by the cantonal government and administrative bodies concerning planning law, arguing that a decision on land use designation was flawed. The court reasoned that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant lacked the requisite standing, as the contested decision did not directly affect their rights or legitimate interests in a way that warranted judicial review under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lower instances' rulings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Planning Law Standing Appeal Dismissed: The court reasoned that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant lacked the requisite standing, as the contested decision did not directly affect their rights or legitimate interests in a way that warranted judicial review under the relevant procedural law, thus affirming the lower instances' rulings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Beschwerdelegitimation Bodenrecht Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Normenkontrolle Verfahrensrechte Plangenehmigung
KI-generiert
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed
III 2018 9
Appeal Against Planning Approval Decision
III 2018 170
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2024 104
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing to Challenge Development Plan
III 2020 34
Municipality Planning Appeal Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 234 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat H.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n