Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2017 213 • VG SZ III 2017 213 KI-generiert

Senior Care Center v. Child and Adult Protection Authority Regarding Ward's Discretionary Funds

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 213
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A senior care center sought judicial review against a child and adult protection authority's decision concerning a ward's discretionary funds, specifically challenging the amount deemed available for the ward's personal use. The court reasoned that the authority correctly applied relevant provisions of the Civil Code when determining the portion of the ward's assets that the representative could dispose of freely, finding the initial determination to be within the legally permissible parameters and not constituting an overreach or misuse of discretion regarding the ward's financial autonomy and needs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Senior Care Center v. Child and Adult Protection Authority Regarding Ward's Discretionary Funds: The court reasoned that the authority correctly applied relevant provisions of the Civil Code when determining the portion of the ward's assets that the representative could dispose of freely, finding the initial determination to be within the legally permissible parameters and not constituting an overreach or misuse of discretion regarding the ward's financial autonomy and needs.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde richterliches Ermessen Kindeswohlgefährdung Finanzautonomie Finanzvorschriften Altenpflege

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is rejected, and costs are imposed on the appellant.
KI-generiert
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2018 209
Appeal Regarding Adult Protective Measure and Alternative Care Arrangement
III 2017 2
Care Recipients' Appeal on Social Assistance and Legal Fees Upheld in Part
III 2020 48
Judicial Review of Child and Adult Protection Authority's Approval of Report and Accounts
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is rejected, and costs are imposed on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 213 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, Seniorenzentrum Engelhof, Engelhofstrasse 1, 8852 Altendorf, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n ZGB (Vertretungsbeistandschaft/ Betrag zur freien Verfügung nach