Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2017 199 • VG SZ III 2017 199 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Demolition and Expansion in Open Space Zone

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 199
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involved an appeal against the rejection of a request for building permission concerning the demolition of an existing structure and the construction of a new, larger building on a property located in an area designated for open space and recreation, where the existing structure was legally non-conforming due to its location within this designated zone. The court upheld the lower instances' decision to deny the permit, reasoning that the proposed project constituted a significant expansion that contravened the established land use plan, which mandates that such areas remain predominantly open and that structural development, especially enlargement, is generally prohibited absent specific, exceptional planning justifications that were not met in this instance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Demolition and Expansion in Open Space Zone: The court upheld the lower instances' decision to deny the permit, reasoning that the proposed project constituted a significant expansion that contravened the established land use plan, which mandates that such areas remain predominantly open and that structural development, especially enlargement, is generally prohibited absent specific, exceptional planning justifications that were not met in this instance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Abbruchbewilligung Bauzone Bauträger Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Plangenehmigung Richtplan Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 199 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt M.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Freienbach, Unterdorfstrasse 9, Postfach 140, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt N.________,, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n