Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2017 193 • VG SZ III 2017 193 KI-generiert

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Custodian Mandate

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 193
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An individual appealed a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority, which had appointed a legal custodian for the individual. The core of the situation involved the authority's decision to mandate a specific role or set of instructions for this appointed custodian under the relevant civil code provisions. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned by analyzing the legal justification for the authority's order concerning the custodian's mandate, ultimately upholding or modifying the original decision based on the scope and necessity of the appointed supervision or assistance as provided by law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Custodian Mandate: The core of the situation involved the authority's decision to mandate a specific role or set of instructions for this appointed custodian under the relevant civil code provisions. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned by analyzing the legal justification for the authority's order concerning the custodian's mandate, ultimately upholding or modifying the original decision based on the scope and necessity of the appointed supervision or assistance as provided by law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Erwachsenenschutzbehörde Kindeswohlgefährdung Anstellungsbehörde Schutzbereich des Patents vormundschaftliche Aufsichtsbehörde Depotstimmrecht ZGB (Auftrag an die Beiständin) | Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht
KI-generiert
III 2021 150
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Welfare Measures
III 2018 157
Appeal Regarding Child Protection Measures and Custodian Appointment
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld
III 2018 212
Appeal of Protective Measure Decision
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 193 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch B.________, \n c/o A.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Innerschwyz, Postfach 1240, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n ZGB (Auftrag an die Beiständin) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: