Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2017 143 • VG SZ III 2017 143 KI-generiert

Corporation v. Zoning Board: Retroactive Application of Land Use Regulation

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 143
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A corporation appealed a decision regarding the retroactive application of a zoning plan change that designated land previously zoned for commercial use as a protected area, which significantly reduced the land's development potential and value. The court reasoned that the administrative authority's decision to apply the new zoning regulation retroactively to the corporation's existing building permit application, which was submitted before the new plan's final approval but during its provisional period, was justified because the legal framework permitted such provisional application, and the goal of protecting the specific land area was sufficiently compelling to override the general expectation of the prior zoning being applied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Corporation v. Zoning Board: Retroactive Application of Land Use Regulation: The court reasoned that the administrative authority's decision to apply the new zoning regulation retroactively to the corporation's existing building permit application, which was submitted before the new plan's final approval but during its provisional period, was justified because the legal framework permitted such provisional application, and the goal of protecting the specific land area was sufficiently compelling to override the general expectation of the prior zoning being applied.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Grundstücksnutzung nachträgliche Baubewilligung Nutzungsplan Gesuch an eine Behörde Bauordnung Zweckänderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Imposed the court costs on the appellant because their appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
III 2021 205
Corporation Zoning Boundary Adjustment Appeal
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2021 39
Appeal Regarding Zoning and Building Law Decision
III 2018 181
Appeal Against Partial Zoning Plan Revision
III 2021 118
Corporation v. Municipal Council (Zoning Permit Denial)

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Imposed the court costs on the appellant because their appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 143 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Januar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Y.________und \n Rechtsanwältin MLaw Z.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinde Wollerau, handelnd durch den Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n