Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2017 14 • VG SZ III 2017 14 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Administrative Authority on Economic Assistance Discontinuation

Geschäftsnummer III 2017 14
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision to discontinue economic assistance, arguing that the administrative authority had failed to adequately consider the claimant's efforts to integrate into society and secure employment, particularly given ongoing health issues that impeded their capacity for work. The court reasoned that while the authority must consider a person's integration efforts and capacity, the record demonstrated that the administrative decision to cease support was based on a justified assessment that the claimant had not made sufficient, reasonable efforts toward self-sufficiency as required under the relevant social assistance regulations, thus upholding the prior ruling.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Claimant v. Administrative Authority on Economic Assistance Discontinuation: The court reasoned that while the authority must consider a person's integration efforts and capacity, the record demonstrated that the administrative decision to cease support was based on a justified assessment that the claimant had not made sufficient, reasonable efforts toward self-sufficiency as required under the relevant social assistance regulations, thus upholding the prior ruling.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Amtshilfe Einstellung der Sozialhilfe Eingliederung in den Arbeitsprozess Beurteilung der Arbeitsfähigkeit begründeter Entscheid bedingte Verfügung Sozialhilfe (Einstellung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) | Sozialhilfe
KI-generiert
III 2017 65
Appeal Against Denial of Economic Social Assistance Due to Employment Capacity
III 2020 30
Failure to Cooperate Justifies Termination of Social Assistance
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
III 2023 201
Appeal Regarding Continued Social Welfare Support Eligibility

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2017 14 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 6. März 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Markus Jakob, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. B.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Sozialhilfe (Einstellung der wirtschaftlichen Hilfe) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: