Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2016 96 • VG SZ III 2016 96 KI-generiert

Construction Project Zoning Appeal Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2016 96
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appeal challenged a cantonal government decision that upheld a municipal council's approval of a construction project, specifically relating to the necessary adjustments of land use and zoning plans to accommodate the development. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the administrative decisions regarding the required plan adjustments lacked a sufficient factual or legal basis, finding that the cantonal authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and complied with relevant spatial planning regulations in approving the necessary changes for the construction.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 64 BGG; Construction Project Zoning Appeal Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the administrative decisions regarding the required plan adjustments lacked a sufficient factual or legal basis, finding that the cantonal authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and complied with relevant spatial planning regulations in approving the necessary changes for the construction.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ermessen der Gemeinde Plangenehmigung Bau- und Zonenordnung Gemeindeland Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Verwaltungsbehörde Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung Gartenhaus) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to regulate the allocation of judicial costs for the unsuccessful appeal.
Art. 64 BGG
The provision was cited regarding the granting of legal aid for the appeal.
KI-generiert
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2023 121
Appeal Challenging Municipal Development Plan Approval
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 170
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the allocation of judicial costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Art. 64 BGG

The provision was cited regarding the granting of legal aid for the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 96 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. Dezember 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Galgenen, Büelstrasse 15, Postfach 141, 8854 Siebnen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n