Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
III 2016 134 • VG SZ III 2016 134 KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld

Geschäftsnummer III 2016 134
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A litigant challenged a decision by an administrative body concerning the denial of a building permit for an agricultural building, arguing that the local authority failed to consider the necessary justification for the structure on the agricultural property and improperly applied zoning regulations regarding building size and location. The court ruled against the appellant, reasoning that the administrative decision was lawful because the appellant did not adequately demonstrate the necessity or functional requirement of the proposed structure on the agricultural land, and the local planning regulations concerning the building envelope and site placement were correctly applied by the lower instance, thus upholding the denial of the permit.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld: The court ruled against the appellant, reasoning that the administrative decision was lawful because the appellant did not adequately demonstrate the necessity or functional requirement of the proposed structure on the agricultural land, and the local planning regulations concerning the building envelope and site placement were correctly applied by the lower instance, thus upholding the denial of the permit.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
landwirtschaftliches Grundstück Baubewilligungspflicht Bau- und Zonenordnung Belegenheit des Grundstücks Verwaltungsbehörde Erstreckung des Pachtverhältnisses Wirtschaftliche Hilfe (Zahnbehandlungskosten) | Sozialhilfe
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2016 134 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Oktober 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Natascha Ofner, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, …, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. B.________, , \n Vorinstanz \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n