Land Expropriation Compensation Valuation Appeal
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertA petitioner challenged a decision concerning the expropriation of land for infrastructure development, specifically contesting the quantum of compensation awarded. The court reasoned that the lower instances correctly assessed the expropriation value based on the property's actual utility and potential for development at the relevant time, finding no basis to overturn the valuation method used, which considered the specific characteristics and zoning restrictions applicable to the parcel, thereby upholding the compensation amount determined by the prior administrative decision.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLand Expropriation Compensation Valuation Appeal: The court reasoned that the lower instances correctly assessed the expropriation value based on the property's actual utility and potential for development at the relevant time, finding no basis to overturn the valuation method used, which considered the specific characteristics and zoning restrictions applicable to the parcel, thereby upholding the compensation amount determined by the prior administrative decision.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2015 220 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. Januar 2016 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw F.________, \n , |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. B.________, , \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n
\n\n
\n