Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2014 183 • VG SZ III 2014 183 KI-generiert

Property Owner Appeal of Construction Project Approval Dismissed

Geschäftsnummer III 2014 183
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A property owner appealed a decision concerning the approval of a construction project, where the project required modifications to existing regulations and had received prior administrative approvals despite objections regarding local planning law conformity and neighbor rights. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly interpreted the relevant planning law provisions regarding the project's scope and impact, finding that the modifications were permissible and the appellant had not demonstrated that their proprietary rights were infringed beyond acceptable legal limits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Property Owner Appeal of Construction Project Approval Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative bodies correctly interpreted the relevant planning law provisions regarding the project's scope and impact, finding that the modifications were permissible and the appellant had not demonstrated that their proprietary rights were infringed beyond acceptable legal limits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Plangenehmigung Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Eigentumsrecht Immobilienbesitz unbewilligter Bau Verstrickungsbruch Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
KI-generiert
III 2024 52
Property Owner's Late Appeal Against Completed Construction Design Dismissed
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2018 160
Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2017 126
Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2014 183 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Mai 2015 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n Dr. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________,________ |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n Ziffer 4 bis 8 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. I.________, \n I.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n