Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2013 5 • VG SZ III 2013 5 KI-generiert

Challenge to Refusal of Residence Permit Extension

Geschäftsnummer III 2013 5
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case concerns a challenge against a decision by local and cantonal authorities concerning the right to reside, where the petitioner was appealing a decision that had effectively rejected her continued stay. The court reasoned that although the petitioner had resided in the country for a significant period, the legal basis for the extension of her residence permit had not been met under the relevant law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the prerequisites for maintaining the right to reside were absent.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG, Art. 66 al. 1 BGG; Challenge to Refusal of Residence Permit Extension: The court reasoned that although the petitioner had resided in the country for a significant period, the legal basis for the extension of her residence permit had not been met under the relevant law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal because the prerequisites for maintaining the right to reside were absent.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Aufenthaltsrecht abgelaufene Aufenthaltsbewilligung Legitimation gegen Baubewilligung Widerruf der Niederlassungsbewilligung Ausdehnung des Besuchsrechts Untätigkeitsklage Ausländerrecht (Kantonswechsel) | Ausländerrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG
The appeal is declared inadmissible because it concerns a non-final decision according to this article.
Art. 66 al. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.
KI-generiert
III 2020 194
Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Residence Permit Based on Insufficient Integration
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2022 68
Cantonal Government Refusal to Rule on Hardship Residence Permit
III 2022 80
Residence Determination Appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a BGG

The appeal is declared inadmissible because it concerns a non-final decision according to this article.

Art. 66 al. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court fees.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2013 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2013 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis und Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterinnen |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. Gemeinde L.________, handelnd durch die Fürsorgebehörde L.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, \n |\n

\n\n

\n