Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
III 2010 115 • VG SZ III 2010 115 KI-generiert

Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions

Geschäftsnummer III 2010 115
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves multiple parties appealing decisions from a district council and a cantonal government council concerning a matter of administrative law. The court reviewed the administrative decisions and the basis for the appeal, ultimately reaching a verdict based on its interpretation of the relevant legal framework governing the dispute between the appellants and the administrative bodies, though the specific subject matter and precise legal reasoning for the final decision are not detailed beyond the procedural context of the appeal against the lower administrative rulings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions: The court reviewed the administrative decisions and the basis for the appeal, ultimately reaching a verdict based on its interpretation of the relevant legal framework governing the dispute between the appellants and the administrative bodies, though the specific subject matter and precise legal reasoning for the final decision are not detailed beyond the procedural context of the appeal against the lower administrative rulings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Streitgegenstand Rahmenbeschluss Anfechtung von Verwaltungsverfügungen Verfahrensüberprüfung Auslegung des Rechts E-Government Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was cited to regulate the costs of the appeal proceedings.
KI-generiert
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2024 44
Appeal Against Municipal Council Administrative Decision
III 2017 110
Appeal Against District Council Administrative Decision

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited to regulate the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2010 115 III 2010 118 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. November 2010 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Josef Hensler, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.rer.pol. Marcel Birchler und Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Sarah Duss, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, (Verfahren III 2010 115) \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, Ziff. 2 bis 4 vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, (Verfahren III 2010 118) |\n

\n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Rathaus 1, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. F.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. G.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n