Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2025 9 • VG SZ II 2025 9 KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer

Geschäftsnummer II 2025 9
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant for supplementary benefits was denied coverage because the responsible compensation fund determined that the claimant transferred assets to a third party shortly before applying, leading to an assumption of asset relinquishment without proper justification. The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Supplementary Benefits Denial Due to Unjustified Asset Transfer: The court, reviewing the decision regarding supplementary benefits based on asset relinquishment, upheld the rejection, reasoning that the burden of proof rests on the applicant to demonstrate that the transfer of assets was necessary and not made with the intention of circumventing the rules for receiving benefits, and in this case, the applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the disposition of the assets.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Juli 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Jeremias Fellmann, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: