Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2025 50 • VG SZ II 2025 50 KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Allowance Calculation Dispute Following Factory Closure

Geschäftsnummer II 2025 50
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The applicant challenged a decision from the unemployment insurance fund regarding the calculation of their daily allowance following a work stoppage due to a factory closure, arguing that the prior earnings used for calculation should reflect a higher period-average wage. The court reasoned that since the factory closure was definitive and the applicant was already receiving an anticipated benefit based on the lower reference period before the actual cessation of employment, the calculation method was legally sound; the applicant's subsequent employment in a different capacity with lower wages after the closure did not retroactively invalidate the original, correctly applied calculation based on the period immediately preceding the insured event.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Allowance Calculation Dispute Following Factory Closure: The court reasoned that since the factory closure was definitive and the applicant was already receiving an anticipated benefit based on the lower reference period before the actual cessation of employment, the calculation method was legally sound; the applicant's subsequent employment in a different capacity with lower wages after the closure did not retroactively invalidate the original, correctly applied calculation based on the period immediately preceding the insured event.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bemessung der Arbeitslosenentschädigung Taggeldberechnung versicherter Verdienst Durchschnittslohn Leistungseinstellung Arbeitszeugnis Arbeitslosenversicherung (Arbeitslosenentschädigung) | Arbeitslosenversicherung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 50 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. November 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n