Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2025 47 • VG SZ II 2025 47 KI-generiert

Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal

Geschäftsnummer II 2025 47
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision by the employment office that suspended their entitlement to unemployment insurance benefits. The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG; Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal: The court reasoned that the relevant insurance provisions required an applicant to actively seek suitable employment that matches their qualifications and previous earnings, and since the claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating adequate job search efforts conforming to the prescribed standards and timelines, the administrative decision to suspend benefits was upheld.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einstellung der Arbeitslosenentschädigung Leistungsanspruch zumutbare Arbeit Arbeitslosigkeit Arbeitslosenversicherungsorgan Neuanmeldung für Invalidenleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG
The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.
KI-generiert
II 2023 77
Claimant v. Labor Office (Unemployment Benefits Suspension Duration)
II 2022 70
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Insufficient Job Search
II 2021 8
Claimant v. Labor Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Insufficient Job Search Efforts
II 2021 76
Claimant v. Employment Office (Unemployment Benefits Dispute)
II 2021 7
Claimant v. Unemployment Benefits Board

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a ATSG

The appeal is dismissed, requiring the appellant to pay the costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 47 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. September 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Mirjam Grbac, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchsberechtigung,