Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2025 38 • VG SZ II 2025 38 KI-generiert

Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer

Geschäftsnummer II 2025 38
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The case involves an appeal against a decision by the Office for Labor to suspend entitlement to unemployment benefits due to the appellant's refusal of a suitable job offer. The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer: The court reasoned that the employment offered was objectively comparable to the appellant's previous employment in terms of duration, required qualifications, working hours, and salary, thereby meeting the legal criteria for a suitable job; consequently, the rejection of this offer justified the suspension of benefits.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einstellung der Arbeitslosenentschädigung zumutbare Arbeit Arbeitslosigkeit Leistungsanspruch Arbeitsverbot Job Sharing

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.
KI-generiert
II 2018 14
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 98
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2018 40
Unemployment Benefits Termination for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2023 93
Unemployment Benefit Denial Upheld for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2020 97
Unemployment Benefits Suspension for Refused Job Offer Upheld, Period Reduced

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
Art. 65 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is dismissed because the contested decision is confirmed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because the appeal was dismissed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n

\n \n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2025 38 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. August 2025 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Pascal Pfeifhofer, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Einstellung in der Anspruchs­berechtigung wegen Ablehnung einer zumutbaren Arbeit) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: