Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2024 83 • VG SZ II 2024 83 KI-generiert

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment)

Geschäftsnummer II 2024 83
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

A claimant appealed a decision by the cantonal equalization office denying supplementary benefits due to the claimant's failure to divest of assets. The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Cantonal Equalization Office v. Claimant (Supplementary Benefits Denial for Asset Divestment): The central issue was whether the claimant, who received substantial gifts shortly before applying for benefits, had intentionally rendered themselves indigent to qualify for the aid. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the voluntary divestment of assets shortly before applying for supplementary benefits, without a valid, impending necessity to make such gifts, constitutes an impermissible circumvention of asset requirements for receiving public assistance, thereby justifying the denial of benefits for the period covered by the divested assets.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
anrechenbares Vermögen Ergänzungsleistungen Entzug von Sozialversicherungsleistungen Vorsorgeausgleich bei Scheidung Konkursbeschlag Unterlassung der Nothilfe Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen
KI-generiert
II 2021 51
Cantonal Compensation Office Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 30
Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
II 2020 84
Appeal Regarding Imputed Asset Waiver Denial for Supplementary Benefits
II 2020 58
Appeal Against Denial of Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputation of Waived Loan as Existing Asset
II 2024 112
Claimant Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Imputed Wealth from Unexplained Asset Decreases

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Dezember 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Andrea Reutter, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: