Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II 2024 75 • VG SZ II 2024 75 KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review

Geschäftsnummer II 2024 75
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Entscheidsuche-Spiegel Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought judicial review of a decision concerning health insurance, specifically challenging the lower court's refusal to entertain the matter. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance in Health Insurance Review: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the appellant failed to meet the procedural requirements for filing, specifically regarding the timely payment of required fees or the provision of sufficient security, thereby justifying the lower court's non-entry into the substance of the claim.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verfahrensüberprüfung Forderungseingabe Krankenversicherung Gesundheitsbezogene Angaben Versicherungsvorbehalt Zulassung zur Kassenpraxis Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) | Krankenversicherung (ohne med. SV)
KI-generiert
ZK1 2021 20
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2018 20
Defendant's Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK1 2022 42
Dismissal of Appeal for Procedural Non-Compliance and Insufficient Substantiation
BEK 2020 115
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance
ZK2 2023 15
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Non-Compliance Regarding Spousal Support Modification

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. November 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Fiona Schuler, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Nichteintreten) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: