Stepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute
Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertAn appellant sought the reimbursement of child benefits previously paid and requested supplementary child benefits for a stepdaughter, which an equalization fund denied, leading to an appeal. The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertStepparent Child Benefit Entitlement Dispute: The court addressed whether the appellant, as a stepparent, was entitled to these benefits for a child residing with them, reasoning that entitlement to supplementary child benefits for stepchildren under social security law depends strictly on meeting the legal criteria regarding dependency and the legal relationship, which in this case were not sufficiently established to warrant the requested payments or reimbursement of previously paid benefits.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n II 2024 22 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2024 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n AHV / IV (Rückforderung Kinderrente / Ersuchen um Kinderzusatzrente für Stieftochter) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: