Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2023 89 • VG SZ II 2023 89 KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 89
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant challenged a decision by the unemployment insurance fund regarding the calculation of their insured earnings, specifically disputing the inclusion of certain variable components in the base salary used for calculating daily allowances following a period of unemployment benefit receipt. The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant legislation concerning the calculation of the reference earnings for daily allowances mandates the inclusion of regular variable payments, such as those tied to company performance or profit sharing, provided they are contractual obligations and not purely discretionary bonuses, thereby upholding the fund's assessment based on the consistent payment history of these components during the relevant period.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bemessung der Arbeitslosenentschädigung versicherter Verdienst vertragliche Pflichten Gewinnbeteiligung der Belegschaft Valideneinkommensermittlung massgebender Lohn
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 89 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Februar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n