Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2023 83 • VG SZ II 2023 83 KI-generiert

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 83
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The appellant sought unemployment insurance benefits after terminating their activity, claiming unemployment, but the insurer denied the claim because the appellant was deemed to hold an employer-like position ("arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung") and thus was not considered an insured unemployed person. The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Benefits Denial Due to Employer-like Position: The court reasoned that even though the appellant was not formally registered as a business owner, the continuous, dominant involvement in and financial control over the prior entity, coupled with the inability to secure comparable employment due to prior commitments, demonstrated an existing close connection to the enterprise such that the appellant could not be considered genuinely available for the labor market, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Versicherungsleistung der Arbeitslosenversicherung Arbeitslosigkeit versicherter Betrieb Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses marktbeherrschende Stellung erwerbstätige Personen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 83 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 13. Dezember 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Anspruch auf Arbeitslosenent-schädigung; arbeitgeberähnliche Stellung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: