Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II 2023 72 • VG SZ II 2023 72 KI-generiert

Insured Ordered to Repay Maternity Benefits Despite Prior Fund Approval

Geschäftsnummer II 2023 72
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Schweiz · Kanton Schwyz (CH-SZ)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

An insured individual, who had received maternity benefits, was subsequently required by the compensation fund to repay a portion of those benefits due to being employed and receiving salary for the same period, despite having informed the fund of the employment beforehand. The insured appealed this demand for repayment, arguing that the compensation fund's prior approval of the benefit payment despite knowledge of the concurrent employment should prevent the subsequent demand for repayment based on an administrative error or estoppel. The court ultimately ruled against the insured, reasoning that maternity benefits are intended to replace lost earnings and that receiving a salary for the same period constitutes unjust enrichment, thus overriding any potential administrative error or reliance interest on the part of the insured, as the statutory basis for repayment of improperly paid benefits remained intact.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insured Ordered to Repay Maternity Benefits Despite Prior Fund Approval: The insured appealed this demand for repayment, arguing that the compensation fund's prior approval of the benefit payment despite knowledge of the concurrent employment should prevent the subsequent demand for repayment based on an administrative error or estoppel. The court ultimately ruled against the insured, reasoning that maternity benefits are intended to replace lost earnings and that receiving a salary for the same period constitutes unjust enrichment, thus overriding any potential administrative error or reliance interest on the part of the insured, as the statutory basis for repayment of improperly paid benefits remained intact.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Mutterschaftsleistung Zahlung der Leistungen Zahlungsauftrag Ausgleichsfonds ungerechtfertigte Bereicherung unrechtmässige Versicherungsleistung
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2023 72 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 4. Januar 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Mutterschaftsentschädigung / Rückforderung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: